Thursday, May 5, 2011

Koleston Conversion Chart For Redken

Baccalaureate: education ... Is not mandatory? I'm alive Obsession

ESO Since we started, we've all heard countless times that mantra of "you are bound to attend class because it is a compulsory education ", and likewise described by the acronym:" Secondary Education ". Although we weigh, was logical that teachers keep at bay the punishment, truancy, paying attention in class, and so on. Because it was a compulsory, once you were enrolled, it was your duty and obligation to go and be a good student.

However ... we also have said many times that the Baccalaureate is a non-compulsory education. And that, theoretically, what is involved? Because I understood that, being a non-compulsory education, the fact miss class or do other things during class automatically becomes YOUR problem, YOU alone business. It is clear that we can not tolerate is that someone to go to class and is dedicated to disturb colleagues, the teacher or just messing. Meeting the teacher just take precautions to deal with such cases.

But ... why suspend someone has missed three days for bronchitis (and medical reasons)? "Turning Down someone a point by four unexcused absences? "Punishing the community to work (in other words, teachers make their work) to a group of students who have missed four classes and a review with all the right in the world, as the substitute teacher rather than help them wore? Honestly, I do not see anything normal.

Often, when asked, "teacher, are you going to stop?" Or "teacher, why you stopped me?" They say: "I have not suspended, you're suspended you alone. " Okay. Then, the notes that we draw are our problem, and if we are not coming to class is too, what's wrong not to attend if, after all, you get to approve the same? And even more so in subjects that, for reasons of fate, the teacher who has touched the situation worsens, either because he can not explain the subject correctly or professional immorality. And all this, say algo que tal vez no sea del todo correcto, pero dudo mucho que no sea así: Profesores, ¿qué más os da si unos cuántos alumnos os faltan, si os van a pagar igual? Y, ¿qué más da si un alumno está distraído o estudiando otra asignatura (sobretodo en un momento de estrés como lo son los exámenes finales de segundo de bachillerato, que, joder, podríais ser un poco comprensivos), si os van a pagar igual?

A ver, también tenemos que tener en cuenta que, lógicamente, si vas a clase es para aprender, y asistir a una asignatura si vas a estar haciendo tarea de otra es una soberana tontería. But what other choice do we have, if we fail to terminally banned any kind, even if thanks to the incredible capacity of teacher education do not learn anything at all?

We do not complain when things organizáis as you want. Within two or three weeks to correct an exam, just punishing students in the afternoon when they should be studying for the simulation of selectivity, leave only one day of rest between the end of classes and the beginning of the recovery (thus leaving people who have to retrieve two subjects on the first day of proficiency with one day to study the entire course of both), not to accept their own mistakes and take the students for the misguided ...

As Mourinho would say: why? I do not understand.

At first glance

0 comments:

Post a Comment